Thursday, December 8, 2011

Crescent Moon, Waning West

The Middle East has been in a state of revolution since January 2011. It all began with one fed up fruit vendor, Mohammed Bouazizi. He had his scale confiscated by a government official and when they would not give it back he did the unthinkable. He filled a canister with gas and in front of a government building in a small town in Tunisia, in the middle of traffic; he poured the canister over himself and lit a match. He barely survived. Videos of the incident would not have been shown on Tunisian television, and if it wasn’t for the fact that 20% of Tunisians had Facebook a revolution might have not occurred but they did. Videos of the man lighting himself on fire went up all over Facebook and when the man died word went out on the Internet and the public responded. Thousands poured into the capital and the dictator, Ben Ali, in fear for his life fled the country. Tunisia was free. But this was only the start. Egypt would soon follow in the steps of Tunisia and soon President Mumbarak resigned. Word was now spreading across the middle east of the revolutions. A Middle East country had never had a leader ousted by its own people and now it was starting. Libya would soon follow in the surge of uprisings and with the help of NATO, over the course of many months, Libyan rebels soon started to win the fight. When Muammar Gaddafi was finally captured and beaten to death it seemed as if the Libyan people had won there revolution. Throughout the Middle East, demonstrations have been taking place, from Yemen to Iran and Saudi Arabia. Additionally Saudi Arabia’s ancient crown prince Sultan has died. His death came at a time when many Saudi Arabians were seeking and demanding that their country modernize faster. What does all of this mean for the west? The U.S. has had relationships with many Middle East leaders and dictators. The U.S. has benefited from these alliances because it would deal with just the leaders alone, not some massive government body. The dictators or leaders had total control. But that could all change very soon. Elections have already been held in Egypt, which has been temporarily controlled by the military following Mubarak’s resignation. Elections will also soon be held in Tunisia and Libya as well. It seems as if these countries, among others, are heading to a democratic rule. One major fear is that fundamentalist Islamic groups might take control of these governments and once they are in control they might not want to leave. These new democratic governments might also not want any part of westernization especially if they are Islamic. Though western influence might waning but Middle Easterners will always have western influence in the fact that its students and businessmen will always flock to the United States for opportunity and knowledge.

http://www.economist.com/node/21534782
http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-18560_162-20033404.html?pageNum=2&tag=contentMain;contentBody

2 comments:

  1. The Arab Spring is definitely as a result of the internet, and it's definitely only the beginning. I also think you're right that these new governments may not always be a good thing. Even if they are democratic, there is no guarantee that they will be friendly to Western ideology, or the United States. In the 1950s Iran actually elected a leader named Mohammad Mosaddegh that was not friendly to western oil interests. The CIA stepped in and staged a fake revolt, called Operation Ajax. We put Mohammad-Rezā Shāh Pahlavi back into power and Iran remained a constitutional monarchy thereafter. This is a perfect example oh how we actually prefer certain monarchies--so long as they keep selling us oil.

    Hopefully the internet won't cause people in the Middle East to hate us any more than they already do.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well narrated. It's quite amazing what these people have done and how quickly it all came together. When you hear individual people's stories, like the first man in your article, you can't help but wonder how some one could ever muster such an act. The truth is I don't think that almost any American's would be capable of such political motivation. While there are a plethora of problems to be dealt with in the US, few stir such anger within us that we would literally set ourselves on fire. This isn’t something for us to be boastful of. This is a movement within a people that we can aspire to. While these countries still have a far way to go in many things we have managed to get right, this is a really proud moment in time for the people of the middle-east with a powerful statement of Arab nationalism to the world; the likes of which has not been seen in quite some time.

    ReplyDelete